Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jojo CMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Jojo CMS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Product is not notable software. 16x9 (talk) 04:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I'm seeing some sources, which is better than most of these CMS articles get.   .  Nothing I'd consider particularly great though, so I'm tending towards delete.  Could be very easily convinced to keep it, though.  We're deleting a lot of stuff out of this category, which I'm starting to worry about now. JulesH (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Many (if not the majority) of the articles in the category are ads for the product write by single purpose, likely CIO accounts. I do look into each before nominating, so not to go to crazy. 16x9 (talk) 13:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.