Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jojo Soria de Veyra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Jojo Soria de Veyra

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article on this subject was deleted in 2010 at Articles for deletion/Vicente-Ignacio Soria de Veyra with the rationale “ On this face of it this is a highly detailed, very well sourced article. However once you get into the nit-gritty it's not sourced at all (not at wikipedia standards). All of the sources are either self-published, non-notable blogs or directory lists. There are a couple of sources that might be considered reliable but the coverage of the subject is trivia.” That rationale still stands. Since 2010 the subject has had one solo exhibition but if we’re looking for in depth coverage in RIS this recreation doesn’t offer it. Mccapra (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously deleted at AFD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 08:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Authors,  and Philippines. Mccapra (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the previous rationale. I looked at all the sources and there aren't any that would be considered independent, reliable, and in-depth. It's good that he was included in a 20th century anthology, but that's about the only noteworthy fact. If the subject continues to produces a body of work that might merit an article in the future. Curiocurio (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 23:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.