Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jokaru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Discussion about a possible redirect can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Jokaru

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All the sources doesn't meet our requirement for WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV. For good, a redirect to the "List of 2023 films in Maldives" or related can help. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 04:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 05:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette Edit! 23:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Asia,  and Maldives. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 04:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Coverage seems to show it’s notable..... - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  07:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:SIGCOV requires an article being significantly covered in reliable sources WP:RS. I still don't find that in the article as the sources aren't reliable. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I see no reason to consider The Press unreliable and it's a review. Muniavas has various articles about the film (https://www.muniavas.com/46563) (definitely not great journalism, but I see no reason to consider it plainly "unreliable").
 * The following inclusionary criteria might also be met; "The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio". Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this, in any language, it should be cited." But if everyone thinks it does not apply and sources are insufficient, sure, redirect to List of Maldivian films of 2023#Feature film should indeed be considered. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  11:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: I also wasn't to note Mushy Yanky has agreed for the redirecting to List of Maldivian films of 2023 and I am fine with it. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * For the record, Mushy Yank(y) (:D) would favour a keep but is not opposed to the redirect if everyone else thinks the sources are insufficient and/or the inclusionary criterion is not met. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  22:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Appears to meet GNG with sources cited in the article. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 08:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.