Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker broadband


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:46, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Joker broadband

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Started little more than one month ago, with no indications that they have yet received any significant coverage. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as a violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - standard searches did not reveal any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Not Delete - As you think it is not available in searches but the company founded in rural (outer area of Tier II city) where lot of people lacks internet connection. This company starts it work providing internet everywhere. So this content not to be deleted.User:barnatony — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.190.150 (talk) — barnatony (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 11:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Not Delete - The companies Article found on local newspaper, which is unable to found on the internet. In particular this Company article found on local pages of newspaper, so it can found on those papers only..Naannee (talk) — Naannee (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. — Preceding undated comment added 06:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment If the company is only covered in the pages of the local newspaper, then it hasn't achieved the required level of significant coverage to be considered notable.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment If it's not notableso we will wait till verified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naannee (talk • contribs) 12:08, 11 August 2015‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Eclipsed, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Everymorning (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:ORG notability criteria are not met.--Rpclod (talk) 02:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article fails the notability criteria for WP:ORG and even it does not meets the general notability guidelines. — CutestPenguinHangout 12:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify pending more sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.