Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolanda Egger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Sandstein  06:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Jolanda Egger

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article is an uncited stub Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 00:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: I realize this is part of a good faith mass nomination by Off2riorob, so I am posting basically the same comment on all of them.  I understand that WP:PORNBIO was changed recently via Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2010 but I don't think that outcome necessarily reflected true consensus.  The bright line rule of "every playmate gets an article" was much easier to administer and reduced editor overhead time, instead of us spending lots of time deciding that some (most?) playmates get articles and a few get shuffled off into some "playmates of 200x" article.  I guess we'll see, if these articles get deleted, whether they get successively recreated. (see also AfDs of 2010 playmates now pending, among others most by same nominator, I think).  I went back to see what the actual track record is here, and I don't see an AfD for a playmate that resulted in a delete since the summer of 2004 (and there's only one!)  I guess WP:PORNBIO eventually was edited to say that playmates are considered notable to reflect what the AfDs were showing and thus avoid pointless debates. See:
 * Votes for deletion/Stephanie Heinrich (Aug 04 - appears it was a delete, article was recreated in July 05 and not been challenged since)
 * Votes for deletion/Audra Lynn (Oct. 04 keep)
 * Votes for deletion/Dalene Kurtis (Dec. 04 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Carmella DeCesare (Feb 05 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Alison Waite (April 06 keep)
 * Articles_for_deletion/Liz_Stewart (March 07 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Marliece Andrada (Sept 07 keep) (Closer comment: "Absent stronger evidence, there is a longstanding consensus that all Playboy centerfolds are notable, given the fame of the publication both within and without its genre.")
 * Articles for deletion/Kimberly Evenson (May 08 keep)
 * Articles_for_deletion/Charlotte Kemp (Jan 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Kelly Carrington (Feb 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Janet Pilgrim (model) (March 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Margie Harrison (March 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Colleen Farrington (March 10 keep)
 * --Milowent (talk) 04:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I haven't found significant coverage of her in reliable, third-party sources for her to meet WP:N. Notability is not inherited by being a playboy bunny, she still needs to meet the general notability guideline. These debates are not pointless when they center around living people only notable for one thing.  Them  From  Space  04:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per Milowent. My compliments to this editor for his memory on this issue. --Morenooso (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Actually I have no past history on this issue, I just searched the "everything" tab for all archived playmate AfDs, because I wanted to see what the past history was.--Milowent (talk) 05:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I worked on a couple of these nominated articles early (to include this one). Normally in an AfD, I like to state a policy. I will do so on my next vote. --Morenooso (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per mainstream appearances. Epbr123 (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Epbr123 along with significant coverage with Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Epbr123 and Morbidthoughts. Dismas |(talk) 14:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Mainstream appearances & first Playmate of the Year in Swiss edition. Thanks also for the laugh for the "Notability is not inherited" argument with regards to a notable position/award/appearance. Dekkappai (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   by the general consensus for playmates of the month.  DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.