Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolly P Joy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Jolly P Joy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References not citing the person on whom the article has been written Shrikanthv (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Shrikanthv (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The ones from The Hindu do. Despite the person's unlikely name (sounds like a character from an off day at Disney...), I feel there could be notability here from the film Ammamanassinu and the tunnels. There seems to be a distinctly self-promotional streak, though, and I wonder if User:Sammathewss (the author here) and User:Jollypjoy (author of Ammamanassinu) are connected. Peridon (talk) 11:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- per evidence at first nomination. A 27-year-old lecturer needs a lot more than the film project to pass WP:PROF and I don't see enough for GNG. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * comment -- the creator is involved in sockpupptery and attacking users, so really doubt on what he is upto Shrikanthv (talk) 07:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the apparent self-promotion, none of the sources in the article covers Joy in anything close to the depth needed to support an article or a pass of WP:GNG, and some of them don't even mention him at all. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.