Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon B. Morgan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Jon B. Morgan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails notability per WP:POLITICIAN Yaksar (let's chat) 20:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Though I'm not comfortable including judges in the notability guideline for politicians, that's where they are now.  Judges holding statewide office, such as state supreme court judges, are considered notable.  But circuit judges, such as this one, aren't. Cullen328 (talk) 23:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I wonder if something could be made of this article. The Ninth Circuit, in which he exercises jurisdiction, includes one very large county of over 1,000,000 people. And there seems to be some non-trivial coverage in the Orlando Sentinel which is a local, but major, newspaper. The coverage there all seems to be behind paywalls, but the titles and bylines suggest there could be a bit there at least for a well sourced stubby bio, such as and . But given that writing a decent article with all of these behind-paywall sources would be a tough ask, and the article is not viable in its current state, I can't argue against deletion.--Mkativerata (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Delete So far, seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN. I was unable to get past the paywall (for some reason, all the databases that should have access are timing out), but from the short excerpts available publicly Mkativerata's links don't seem to suggest anything more than routine news and human-interest coverage; nothing to suggest lasting historical notability. Weak, because I couldn't get past the paywall. Ray  Talk 19:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsuccessful political candidate who fails WP:POLITICIAN AND WP:GNG. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  09:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.