Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Braeley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.. Michig (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Jon Braeley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

self-written self-promotional tone with puffery in the lead, sourced to his own IMDB and an inaccessible item Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as by far nothing minimally convincing for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing close to secondary coverage I've found is this short article, which is basically just a YouTube link. Timothy Joseph Wood  13:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be an autobiography with no indication of notability. My search found no significant independent coverage and none is given in the article. Papaursa (talk) 17:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Kudos for the portrait, which is orders of magnitude better than the usual crap images attached to autobiographical/promotional fare. Carrite (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant independent coverage and no evidence of notable accomplishments.Mdtemp (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Millbug  talk 21:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable architect and photographer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Black Belt magazine mentioned could show some notability, but there is no any evidence online about such mention ever existed. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.