Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Clark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 13:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Jon Clark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Stub article for non-notable reality tv participant, article repeats and reads more as an advertisement. Jamesbuc (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jamesbuc (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable television personallity.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the deletion rationale is misguided. It is irrelevant that it is a stub - Wikipedia has no problem with stubs. If it reads like an advert, fix it or tag it. Why have you not suggested an WP:ATD? Why do you feel that he doesn't meet WP:ENT #1: Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. He was a runner-up on one major show (Love Island) and was a cast member for years on another very well-known show, TOWIE. It needs improvement, absolutely, but meet the guidelines for inclusion. From this long list of nominations, I've seen zero evidence of any WP:BEFORE or any attempt to improve the articles - this is disruptive, . Boleyn (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Jamesbuc is correct. Notability is met per WP:ENT. While excessive promotionalism is actually a potential deletion basis (and not just through G11), that level is not met here. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.