Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Schueler chronology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Jon Schueler chronology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Useless timeline article. Basically all information already included in Jon Schueler. bender235 (talk) 23:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge - there is nothing here that justifies a separate page from Jon Schueler. Whiteguru (talk) 06:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete - aboslutely not needed and a redirect would be worse than useless. Bearian (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to parent article. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Every biography already incorporates the dimension of time. No need for a chronology article on a person. Steve Dufour (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as pointless and unnecessary -- Whpq (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as redundant to a biography. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 23:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * delete and redirect -- Any useful material in this article should go in the main article on Joh Schueler. I checked the contribution history of these two articles.  User:DigitalMind, started both articles in early 2007.  Other contributors seem to have  made editorial contributions to the Jon Schueler article, but DigitalMind was essentially the sole contributor to this article.  DigitalMind hasn't been online for two years.  I suggest redirection not because I think Jon Schueler chronology is a likely search term, but rather so the contribution history is not lost, and anyone interested in incorporating elements of this article into the main article can do so.  Geo Swan (talk) 18:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.