Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonah Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   02:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Jonah Smith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I still confirm and echo my PROD: "Searches found several links particularly Books, News and browsers but all mostly unusable coverage for notability and also mostly local news, so all in all, there's no convincingly outstanding improvement here yet.". SwisterTwister  talk  08:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  14:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  14:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  14:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. What about the coverage I indicated when I deprodded it? You didn't find any of that? --Michig (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems he was on America's Got Talent and got lots of coverage because of that, although there is other stuff as well, including:, , , , . Some of that is pretty in depth so I think it would meet the notability guidelines and would be enough for a full length article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep per sources provided by . Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 07:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.