Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Beuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Beuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. The individual does not meet the notability reuirements as outlined at WP:ATHLETE; they have not partcipated at the highest level of their sport, nor do they meet general notability criteria. Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 01:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Can't find any sources. Does not meet any WP:ATHLETE criteria. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 05:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 21:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℳøℕø 01:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I confess I don't know much about Canadian curling. But it does appear that this guy is not notable. The technicalities of WP:ATH and how it applies to curling aside, there are no sources for this BLP. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (weak) "win the Canadian championship." COMPETING at a national level isn't notable, but how about winning?  Especially since it qualifies the team to go to the international level.   David V Houston (talk) 22:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I appreciate that there may be some notability here, but this is a BLP and we need sources to document the facts of the article. At present, it appears that no sources are available - and, thus, we need to delete. If we find sources later on, an article might be appropriate - but that's not the case, at present. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable grad student. Unsourced and probably an autobiography. Hairhorn (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.