Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Browne (racing driver)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Jonathan Browne (racing driver)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a racing driver who has only competed in very minor series and seems to be notable only for one event (winning the Formula Ford Festival). Most coverage is WP:ROUTINE, with this Autosport article and this Formula Scout article coming the closest to providing significant coverage that I can find in a WP:BEFORE search. Two of the Formula Scout articles cited in the article do focus on the subject ("FF1600 star Jonathan Browne to race in Indy Pro 2000 with Turn 3" and "FFord Festival winner Jonathan Browne to join GB3 with Hillspeed"), but both are just fairly routine announcements which both relate back heavily to said FF Festival win. What sourcing there is on this driver would probably be far better used creating articles about the events they have competed in rather than in creating a WP:BLP. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – No clear claim to significance and does not meet GNG. Coverage is primarily focussed on events which as the nominator notes should be what our articles are on, rather than on the drivers with fleeting and insignificant notability. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 15:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and 5225C. No evidence of notability that I could find in my own searches. A7V2 (talk) 08:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject doesn't appears to be notable as per gng.Timetraveller80 (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.