Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Dawson (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Jonathan Dawson (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While he technically meets the "presumed" low notability threshold of WP:NFOOTY, there is nothing further to be found online, it seems: no career, no birth or death information, no biographical background, nothing. Fails WP:GNG quite badly. Fram (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. It would be sensible to redirect this, but there is no suitable target (1906–07 Burnley F.C. season does not exist, and List of Burnley F.C. players requires 50 appearances for inclusion for some reason). GiantSnowman 20:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. We simply don't need articles like this.  RobinCarmody (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails the spirit of NFOOTBALL and fails every other guideline. Geschichte (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, and as mentioned above, no suitable redirect/merge target exists. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per all comments above and nomination. This was an easy call. Spf121188 (talk) 20:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.