Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan FeBland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 20 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I'm going to interpret Sparafucil's comment as a "weak keep" so I don't have to say "no consensus". (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan FeBland

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Beyond the WP:COI concerns and peacockery raised at the composer's project page, the subject of this article unambiguously fails the notability standard articulated at WP:COMPOSER. It should be noted that the reference to "publications" by Sibelius refers to an upload section on the website promoted by the popular notation program Sibelius. Eusebeus (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The Universal Edition claim checks out and I think establishes notability. Sparafucil (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - A thoroughly bad article, but notable in scope. In addition to the publications noted by Sparafucil, he has apparently composed for a CD produced by a significant indie label and a quick JSTOR search shows performance listings in a number of issues of The Musical Times and CD Reviews indexed by NotesSecond. Zachlipton (talk) 01:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.