Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Ian Mathers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Ian Mathers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Also Includeded in this discussion
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This guy is an independent flash artist, like thousands of others. Absolutely nothing to establish notability. Having some experience with fans related to his endeavors I'm going to get this out of the way now: Afd is not a vote. Showing up and claiming he's notable, or anything of the like without providing sources which meet WP:V and WP:NOTE won't result in this article being kept. If you want this article kept you need to provide the sources and whoever said this is full of crap. he's real, who would a fake person make flash shows that meet that criteria. Blogs, forums, stories from your kid brother, and college newspapers don't meet that threshold for inclusion. To get the ball rolling the guy doesn't even get coverage in some of the lower end blogs google news sometimes returns search results in: .Crossmr (talk) 12:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * comment since both people brought it up, I'm going to include it in this Afd. I think there is a template but I haven't done it before. Neurotically yours suffers from the same issue. No notability at all.--Crossmr (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some firm evidence of notability is forthcoming. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * see also Neurotically Yours. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was debating whether or not I should include it, or do it separately or wait or what. I've tried to clean it up for a long time but its been an uphill battle. I just finally thought to check on notability and found there really wasn't any.--Crossmr (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * After this article goes, the Neurotically Yours article could probably be uncontroversially speedied. It's (mostly) sourced to Newgrounds. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete no sources and no real claim to notability--the article even comes right out and says virtually nothing at all is known about him. Recommend Neurotically Yours also be deleted. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. yeah thats right, EDITed!!!