Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Joly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Joly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not clear how he passes WP:GNG no indepth coverage in independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Youtuber with no significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Apparently part of a little WP:Walled garden created by SPA User:CalebBenjamin012. See related Articles for deletion/Anna Saccone. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable YouTuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete (per nom). Or Merge/Redirect (to article on YT channel rather than person who runs that YT channel). As noted by other AfD contributors, neither subject nor spouse demonstrate notability independent of the YT channel they run. Which is why both articles have almost exactly the same content (and likely always likely would). Per WP:MERGEREASON, where we have two almost identical articles, covering materially the same content, we merge em. If indeed we keep em. Hence, if the YT channel meets the NN criteria for that kind of subject, then perhaps redirects are warranted. (As per similar articles like Rhett and Link, Smosh, etc). The project definitely however does not benefit from two near-identical articles on the current subjects however. Guliolopez (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.