Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Keltz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Keltz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A role in a single film and a few minor or single episode roles in television series but nothing, so far as I can see, to establish notability. HJ Mitchell |  fancy a chat?   15:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, zero notability here. JBsupreme (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice until such time as this actor gets some coverage. What I found are mentions . Oh, he was in some nice stuff, no denying... but no one thought to single him out for coverage.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * When Michael Q Schmidt thinks something should be deleted, even without prejudice, you can pretty much bet the farm that it will be done. JBsupreme (talk) 08:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well... you know my habit is to actually try to fix something first, rather than simply looking at it and remarking it could never be. So I cleaned it up and went on a hunt for sources, before reporting back here.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you did, Michael, but I did my homework and, unfortunately, came up with similar results. Perhaps somebody'll write about him in detail but it's unlikely to happen before the end of this AfD. :-( HJ Mitchell  |  fancy a chat?   04:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate well that you are a truly diligent nominator, and I have great respect for your understanding of WP:IMPROVE and use of WP:BEFORE. I'll still tilt at the occasional windmill. I might fail, but there is no honor in never having tried. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.