Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Kubben Quiñonez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G11. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Jonathan Kubben Quiñonez

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional, non-notable, and non-encyclopedic. Claimed to be a notable "influencer", which I think it means someone whose only significance is getting publicity for themselves. He had a former career as a model, but I see no evidence that he was notable in that either.

The Forbes ref is from a "former contributor", meaning it is not a RS for anything. The other references are equally useless. I have not searched Google, because what I find there will be his publicity. There's no reason anyone would ever give him significant coverage.

The article was written by a disclosed paid editor, who is naïve enough to admit "an interest in making Wikipedia articles of celebrities from all over the world who has a good following base but they don't have the visibility on search engines. I am a digital marketing expert and a new editor on Wikipedia who's willing to create articles of celebrities and give them visibility with help of Wikipedia."

He created his first articles in Draft (and they are still there); once he became autoconfirmed, he created this in mainspace, which is of course against god practice for paid editing --it's time we made that policy. I thought about moving this to draft also, but I don't think there's a chance of an acceptable article.  DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Totally agree with nominator, I bookmarked this (uncreated at that time) page yesterday when I read the disclosure and sure enough a non-reliably sourced vanity type article appears today JW 1961   Talk  19:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article, your contribution to Wikipedia is really helping people. I'm just trying to make an article of Jonathan who is an internet celebrity with a good following base on social media. he has been awarded for Philantrophy in 2018 by influencer awards Monaco and influencer of the year 2019 by influencer awards Monaco. I think he's information on Wikipedia will help the internet users.

I know I don't have proper references for the article and all your claims are true but I'm trying to gather all the proper references, by Monday 8 February 2021 i shall have all the proper references and i will make sure im following to all your claims and making the content encyclopedic. Mohirfan03 1:20, 7 February (IST)
 * Delete possibly speedy delete under WP:G11 and WP:A7 given the sourcing is either non-independent sourcing or clearly paid for press. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

By tomorrow 8 February 2021, i shall have all the proofs regarding the claims. I will link all the sources properly this time. I have just joined Wikipedia please allow me to make this right. Mohirfan03 (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2021 (IST)
 * Comment I have tagged the article for speedy deletion under WP:G11, there's no need to keep a paid for vanity page up for a whole week, especially after WP:BEFORE shows up nothing that is notability-lending. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedied. Deb (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.