Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Leventhal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly  (o rly?) 16:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan Leventhal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined speedy A7 because he's apparently designed games and won an award. Looking closer, it turns out that the games are redlinked, and the award was from some film school. Googling this name brings up MySpaces and blogs, and the nature of the content suggests this is a WP:AUTO case. Steel 23:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The red links are now fixed, and I have added external links about Jonathan Leventhal's career in game design. — Diplodocusbones (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Strong delete. The arguments for notability are unconvincing. More importantly, the article history reveals a clear conflict of interest.  The entire article was created by User:Diplodocusbones.  The same user is also the sole creator of Edgar Lopez: Janitor of Souls, which links to the Leventhal page in several places.  That article also has no other contributors, nor has Diplo made any other contributions at all.  For this reason I am adding Edgar Lopez: Janitor of Souls to this AfD nomination. YechielMan 01:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Both articles written by Diplodocusbones, are written in a neutral manner. If linking related articles is against your policy, then all links can be removed, it is not a problem. The reason Diplodocusbones created the Edgar Lopez: Janitor of Souls article immediately, is because you were complaining about all the red links in the Jonathan Leventhal article. — Diplodocusbones (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - fails WP:N and WP:V... Addhoc 12:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.