Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Levine (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Levine (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod removed. Disambiguation page containing only 2 items, 1 of which is a redlink with no relevant blue link, nor any incoming links. Disambiguation pages need only disambiguate Wikipedia articles, not the whole www. Redlink of doubtful notability based on Ghits. Tassedethe (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Both entries appear to be of some relevance. Google provides approximately 135,000 matches for '"jonathan levine" AND gallery' and approximately 267,000 matches for '"jonathan levine" AND director' returns approximately 267,000 matches. Harrigan (talk) 15:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Is this the right place for this deletion discussion? Undead Warrior (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. I'm pretty sure. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * '''Yes, as everything in the article namespace should be discussed here. Tavix (talk) 19:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep if Harrigan or anyone else plans to create the other article in the near future. Otherwise delete or move the only blue link over it or whatever, and recreate the appropriate disambiguator when needed. - Eldereft (cont.) 18:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nevermind, Tavix below is correct. Leave the bluelink on the unmodified title. - Eldereft (cont.) 21:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per MOS:DABRL as it states that an article with only one blue link is unnecessary because of the fact that it isn't disambiguating anything. Even if the article about the other guy is created, a hatnote should be created to the other guy's article and not a disambiguation. Tavix (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.   —Tavix (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Tavix. One blue link in disambiguation page is unnecessary.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Would Jonathan Levin be appropriate for the page? -- Suntag  ☼  07:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.