Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Mariner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Mariner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A directory-like listing on a non-notable businessperson. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, such as this interview or coverage in user-generated section in Forbes:. Affiliated with a nn company TaxDay with no other indications of notability or significance. I don't believe that "highest-ranking minority employee at the central office of MLB" is enough:. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete A mid level manager with a moderately interesting career, who does not rise to the level of notability. All of the coverage in reliable sources results from promotion or press releases by the organizations he has been involved with. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete- For reasons stated above, he is not notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - I made the stub. I don't disagree with the assessments above - I felt I'd just barely found enough references to show notability when it went live, and I looked around pretty carefully. So if these aren't enough, I doubt more research will help, and deletion would be sensible. Benji the Pen (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete CFOs are very rarely notable, except in some of the biggest corporations and with significant coverage. Same goes for CEOs of non-notable companies, and many CEOs of notable companies as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.