Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Mott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 21:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Mott

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable educational administrator DGG (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with DGGs comment. -Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  --  The  left orium  21:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Search of GS with "author:Jonathan Mott" gives one possible hit with four cites. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Comment: Curious how this is any different from hundreds of other articles like Stephen Reno? Billbowery (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * One difference is that Stephen Reno appears to pass WP:Prof #6. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Ahh, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. Billbowery (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Try searching for "Jon Mott" - if there was a way to link "Jon Mott" to "Jonathan Mott" then you'd see a lot of references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.220.218 (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article provides strong evidence that he doesn't pass WP:PROF: he is an administrator rather than a researcher, but not at a high enough level of administration to pass that way. I see no indication that he passes WP:BIO or any other similar criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.