Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Ng

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche talk 5 pillars July 2, 2005 03:22 (UTC)

Jonathan Ng, Tan Ding Xiang
I quote: Jonahtan [sic] Ng &#65288; &#40644; &#39567; &#26480;&#12309;is a Singaporean student.He is also a blogger and a Wikipedia browser.Tan Ding Xiang introduced Wikipedia to him. Do I really need to elaborate? -- Hoary 07:30, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)

I quote: Tan Ding Xiang,(&#38472;&#40718; &#32724; )born 1992,is a Singaporean student.His friends include Jonathan Ng. Do I really have to elaborate? Oh, OK: vanity. -- Hoary 07:33, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)

PS Or speedy delete, to avoid unnecessary prolongation of any embarrassment for these two people, who perhaps just hadn't understood the difference between regular articles and user pages. Note that User:Tdxiang already exists. -- Hoary 13:47, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)


 * Comment. Combined virtually identical vfd's for efficiency, as no votes had yet been cast. Here's one: Delete both, non-notable, vanity. -- BD2412 talk 07:48, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Non notable vanity. JamesBurns 08:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 10:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Damn, I found Wikipedia all by myself. Does that mean I can't have an article? Delete both blatant vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 10:57, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete before they start introducing other people to Wikipedia and creating more vanity articles for them!    &mdash; P Ingerson (talk) 11:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Conceit, introducing the new wave of personality cult. Slivester 11:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, anyone who can use a computer is notable. Delete. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 12:03, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Please review no personal attacks. Kappa 14:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see any personal attacks in that bit of general sarcasm. I also don't see anything meeting the speedy deletion criteria, regardless of whether any of us agrees with Hoary's pragmatic reasoning.  Non-speedy delete or, better, userfy the one without an existing user page and explain policy to these users.  Barno 17:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy per Hoary above seems best. Kappa 14:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim to notability at all in either article. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:21, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete User page -Harmil 21:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy under section 1.2.1. I'd say userfy Tan Dian Xiang, but it looks like the info has already been copied there.  --Xcali 21:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity, belongs on a user page. --Etacar11 23:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.