Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Nissenbaum (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Nissenbaum
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously nominated for deletion in May 2006, rational for keeping (put forward by one editor) would not pass muster now. Three others at that time argued for deletion. He is still an assistant prof, and his h-index looks to be in the single digits. Abductive (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Abductive (talk) 00:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF and the reasons in the last AfD (who he has studied under or worked with) are irrelevant. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF. Cxz111 (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Assistant professor and minor papers, no outside recognition of any note. DreamGuy (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. He has a couple of decently cited papers in Google scholar (164 cites for "Investigations of covert phrase movement", 94 for "Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR") but not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF #1, and he clearly doesn't pass the other criteria of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.