Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Park

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:notability. Also very badly written and virtually incomprehensible. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 16:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. While I admit I'm not doing well finding reliable source coverage, that's not necessarily surprising as the subject is a Christian Conservative-themed radio drama (not likely to get much mainstream coverage). It's popular on the web and apparently is broadcast through over 750 radio outlets worldwide, so I'd say it's notable.  Feel free to edit the article if you think it's poorly written.  Baileypalblue (talk) 17:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no problem maintaining articles on highly syndicated radio programs. I expect the article has improved since nomination, but still, AfD is not cleanup. -Verdatum (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Television shows are considered notable if they're highly syndicated, so radio shows should be no different. I'm not a fan of the sources used since it's not clear were target or the other store got the information from, but since the creators are unlikely to spread false information on highly visible pages, I think it's worth further investigations. - Mgm|(talk) 22:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to satisfy notability based upon width of circulation, as noted above. Content issues can be handled at the article level, as AFD is not for cleanup. 23skidoo (talk) 23:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - The sources are on the weak side, but a widely syndicated radio show has some inherent notability. I've expanded and cleaned up the article as well.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  00:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strongly Urge Keep. There is large following of this program and more information can be added. Article just needs a little clean up. 2writeornot2write (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2009


 * Keep. - Jonathan Park is very popular among homeschoolers. Jehorn (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per above.  TheAE  talk / sign  05:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.