Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Paul Cambry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Jonathan Paul Cambry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable in Wikipedia terms ... no significant mentions from reliable sources. Created by the subject himself and there is often promotional editing related to the article (recent example, which led me to this page). This article was proposed for deletion by Ohnoitsjamie with an endorsement by TonyTheTiger before the proposed deletion template was removed by the editor who has made the promotional edits that I linked above. I now think it's worth nominating this page to deletion from a process with much more teeth. P.s. the link added in this edit that tried to counteract the proposed deletion is in no way a significant mention. Graham 87 15:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No non-trivial coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:BIO criteria, nor WP:MUSIC criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music about this discussion. Graham 87 15:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – on the merit of this article previously having gone through AfC, and the initial author (presumably identical to the subject of the article) apparently not having edited the article any more after it had gone to mainspace, after following correct AfC procedure. AfC means that at least one non-involved editor thought the article passed WP:GNG, or it wouldn't have gone to mainspace in the first place. pinging the editor who moved the article to mainspace, and the editor who posted the AfC accept note on the initial editor's talk page. --Francis Schonken (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Being passed through AFC by a single editor doesn't exempt a subject from having to meet WP:GNG requirements. Which criteria do you believe are being met here? OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't meet notability criteria, and reads like a piece of wikipuffery - (as does, for that matter, the WP article on his brother Emile Cambry, Jr. which also seems to me to a prime candidate for deletion).--Smerus (talk) 09:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Wow, I never really checked that article out. Duly nominated at Articles for deletion/Emile Cambry Jr. Graham 87 15:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet notability criteria. Also an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete JPC is not the central subject of any critical commentary in WP:RS. Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC, etc.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.