Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Shieber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Jonathan Shieber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, warning tag present for over a year with no action. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and. Unscintillating (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)]
 * Delete The subject can be verified as a working journalist but that is simply man-with-a-job; no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: And nominator cannot vote -- removed. Crtew (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: The nomination was a banned contribution; however, since another editor has made a good faith comment in support of deletion, this discussion is not speedily closed. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of notability. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Because the article is a stub, and with only one reference, it is not eligible for the notibility guidelines unless the article has improvements and better sourcing. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.