Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Trichter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Jonathan Trichter

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was redirected, then reverted without explanation or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NPOL.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The article could be expanded upon to meet GNG, but the subject is notable by being a registered Democrat nominated by the GOP for a statewide office (this fact got this article on the main page of Wikipedia many months before this deletion request). Received 1.5 million votes and ran an important campaign that should be covered more should this article be allowed to stay. Capisred (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete We don’t normally host articles about unsuccessful candidates for office unless they are notable anyway, and I can’t see that this subject is. Mccapra (talk) 03:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL as an unelected candidate for a state office. KidAd  •  SPEAK  19:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsuccessful election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates per se, but this features neither properly sourced evidence that he had preexisting notability for other reasons independently of an unsuccessful candidacy, nor a credible reason why his candidacy would pass the ten year test as a topic of more enduring significance than everybody else's candidacies. (Having a cross-party nomination isn't enough to vault a person over that bar.) Bearcat (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.