Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Weiss (filmmaker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Jonathan Weiss (filmmaker)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't see a credible claim of notability here. TheLongTone (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as it stands sole claim to fame is making a nonnotable version of a notable novel - David Gerard (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The problem here is that wikipedia notability is being asserted by the author based on the subject being a filmmaker. Yet his sole work in that industry is not notable, comprising sources that merely prove existence. However, other sources--multiple and credible (Billboard, NY Times, etc)--indicate that his true notability is for creating and running Oswald Mill Audio. I think this article can be salvaged by rebadging it "Jonathan Weiss (Entrepreneur)" rather than (filmmaker). Another thing to consider is to make the article about the Audio company rather than about Weiss. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * comment The company may me notable, but that does not necessarily make the ceo notable.
 * Delete as there is no inherited notability from any works, regardless of what information is involved therefore there's nothing else to suggest otherwise better if there's no independent substance. SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.