Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Whitlock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Whitlock

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This post-doc fails WP:PROF. Geschichte (talk) 22:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find significant coverage.  — fetch ·  comms   01:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. GScholar does show one very well-cited paper, but postdocs are generally not academically notable under WP:PROF, barring something exceptional (which does not appear to be the case here). Perhaps will be academically notable in a few years, but not yet. Nsk92 (talk) 03:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet notable via WP:PROF - UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even the "references" give this one away – for example the one for the LTP discovery points to his presumable advisor. This person has not yet earned any distinction separate from his grad-school/postdoc advisors. Agricola44 (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete. One well-cited paper, even as first author, does not present clear enough evidence of independent notability. There's plenty of time to add a better article later if he follows up on this promising start with more high-quality research. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.