Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Williams (pastor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash talk 00:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Jonathan Williams (pastor)
Previously listed for afd under a hopelessly POV title. The discussion there disintegrated into a fanatical trollfest, so I'm re-listing in the interest of a dignified consensus, no vote. — Feb. 28, '06 [12:03] 
 * Delete. nn-bio, POV. --Ter e nce Ong 13:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, again. He has plenty of mention in media outlets per the last AfD. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * "Plenty" is an overstatement, to say the least. Archived Afd is here. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Seeing as oen is plenty enough for WP:BIO, arguably three-plus is "plenty" in my book. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 16:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Definitely notable as seen in media, significant web sites, etc. Kestenbaum 23:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kestenbaum and Badlydrawnjeff. JoshuaZ 01:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete individual churches are not per se notable and neither are their pastors no matter how outré their beliefs may be. Carlossuarez46 19:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Standard "15 minutes" is not enough to be notable, certainly not with the media outlets given. He didn't exactly make the cover of Time. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per KillerChihuahua. Stifle 22:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.