Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathon Deering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Jonathon Deering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any sources for this guy except IMDB, does not appear to meet any of the automatic criteria at WP:COMPOSER. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

There are a good few — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodeeandrews (talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There are a good few what? sources? If you have some reliable sources please post the URLs here. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  23:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

You'll find them at the bottom of the page you want to delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodeeandrews (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I think you misunderstand. Please read WP:GNG first. The sources provided do not suggest notability as Wikipedia defines it and they certainly do not demonstrate it.  Velella  Velella Talk 23:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   02:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   02:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   02:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable composer. Article has no third-party citations and the external links are not viable sources. sixty nine   • speak up •  21:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find nothing around which suggests notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.