Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathon Douglass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Hillsong Church, where he's mentioned. Nothing to merge really, but if someone finds more material someday that would make him notable, he won't have to restart from nothing (unless he doesn't look at the history). There's nothing offensive enough here to merit deleting the history. - Bobet 10:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Jonathon Douglass
I speedied this as an nn-bio after it was tagged by an IP, but I've restored it after a request from a contributor. I feel that this article does not do a good job of saying how Jonathon meets WP:BIO, and definitely needs citations from reliable sources. Delete per WP:BIO/WP:MUSIC. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep - I agree with Stifle that the article in its current form does not show notability and needs a fair bit of work. However, I feel it should be kept as it part of a collection of articles about the Hillsong Church in Sydney who are very well known in the Christian community, releasing over 50 music albums over 15 years. Marky1981 09:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete per User:Stifle. There is so little information there that the ball might get rolling better as part of the Hillsong Church article itself. If it becomes complete/notable of its own merit, it could be split later. Komdori 14:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete per User:Stifle. Agree his information could simply be merged into Hillsong Church. He is not notable. --Shrek05 19:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

SMerge (if anything is there) into Hillsong Church. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.