Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathon Payne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Jonathon Payne

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in secondary sources. Narrow scope of notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in secondary sources. Narrow scope of notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in secondary sources. Narrow scope of notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in secondary sources. Narrow scope of notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete We have articles on the books. The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that we don't really need a description of a character from the books. Now that I've said that... there's probably a precedent here that I'm missing... -- Swerdnaneb 00:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject indicates that the topic is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.