Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones Comix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Plenty good enough consensus below and Emperor covers everything we need to look at policy and guidance wise. This is not a speedy candidate though, the article subject matter does not meet the crieria enshrined in db-inc. I don't see the value in keeping this open any longer, and I'd point out that proposed deletion might be a better venue for similar articles in the future. Hiding T 11:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Jones Comix

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability, and no evident sources to establish it. Very few Google Web hits relevant to the topic, none of which seem to be independent and/or reliable; zero hits on Google News or Google Books. Fails WP:N. Deor (talk) 22:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 13:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:N and also WP:V. I had a look round and could find very little on this (not even on the Bugpowder blog which covers British small press comics) so I'm reluctantly going to have to suggest it is deleted, pending someone coming up with good sources. It may just be new and looks interesting so there is no problem with recreating when the sources can be found - the creator of the article might want to work on this in their sandbox and I'll add anything I stumble across (as I keep my eye out for such sources). (Emperor (talk) 14:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC))
 * Delete per nom.Inmysolitude (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under db-inc. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.