Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonnie Nicely


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1956. --MuZemike 20:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Jonnie Nicely

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable Fasttimes68 (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect the additional sources helps, but still falls short of GNG. Fasttimes68 (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's a lengthy LA Times article with biographical info. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete, the LA Times piece really just reinforces that there's nothing particularly notable about her. She's listed here. . Suggest the ref be moved to that page.   Wikipelli Talk   12:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The LA Times article satisfies WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, i can't get by the wp:gng suggestion that "Multiple sources are generally expected." (emphasis on plural) The Times piece is (to me) a puff piece about a woman that was a bunny and then worked in a factory. I don't consider that notable. Again, per wp:notable, she's listed in another article and does not warrant an article of her own.   Wikipelli  Talk   22:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * GNews shows at least two other LA Times articles in 1986 and 1994. Unfortunately they're behind a paywall. Pburka (talk) 23:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the original 1956 Playboy presumably contained more than just a photo. There's typically an article or biography included. This means that she was the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources in 1956, 1986, 1994 and 1995. Notability isn't a matter of opinion or importance. It's based on the simple criteria set forth in WP:GNG which this article satisfies. Pburka (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete the list is more then enough. BO ; talk 18:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1956. Maybe there's a borderline notability, but anyway, as the article is very short, it could be easily merged there. Cavarrone (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.