Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoogSquad (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

JoogSquad
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG, poorly written Hawkeye75   (talk)  02:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless there is some definitive bar where "x number of views makes you notable enough for your own WP page," i don't see how this page passes WP:GNG. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 03:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If anything, it's WP:TOOSOON. Most of the sources used appear to be referencing one incident which is not enough for WP:GNG. Gargleafg (talk) 03:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable youtube channel.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.