Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoomShaper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

JoomShaper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just not notable company Clnreee (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep:I think the user:Clnreee is doing general pattern of disruptive behavior and editing as a battleground. He created this account just 1 day ago and it's seems to be he create this account only for put deletation nomination on articles. He already put a lot of deletation tag on many notable article. He is putting tag in articles and in afd pages he is writting Just not notable.
 * 1. It has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
 * 2.The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered and it's enough for notability.
 * 3. Widely written in many category-A level newspapers of Bangladesh. (Prothom alo, Jugantor, The daily Star, Sanakal etc)
 * 4. Received international awards and honours
 * 5. Ranked 2nd among Joomla companies from all over the world.
 * 6. Nationally and internationally famous.
 * 7. Arranged many international conferences & it is internationally recognized. (Joomla World Conference)--123.108.244.85 (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I strongly object to the sexists attacks and unfounded allegations from the anonymous IP 123.108.244.85. I am a SHE.  Clnreee (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete In response to anon IP. You have mentioned at your first point above that the company has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject but you failed to point to a single reference to support your assertion. Your 4th reason states that it has won many international awards and honours but you fail to provide a single example. None of the other reasons you provided have been supported by any references either. An examination of the references in the article shows the following:
 * This bdnews reference is a mention-in-passing as the founder won an award, fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * This Daily Star reference only mentions the company as in the company's CEO attended an event. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * This Sharebiz reference is based on a company announcment (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Jagonews reference is a mention-in-passing (name used in the title of the CEO) and fails WP:CORPDEPTH
 * This Channel Online reference fails for the same reasons as the Sharebiz reference above (pretty much the same content too)
 * This Prothom Alo reference fails as it is churnalism, relies exclusively on information provided by the company with not clear indications of independent content, fails WP:ORGIND. This reference is the exact same content and fails for the same reason.
 * This Priyo reference fails as it is based on a company announcement and also has no in-depth information on the company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * This howiwork reference is an interview with the founder and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Tech Shohor reference is classic churnalism (mostly a profile on the founder) and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Manobkantha reference is marked as a "permanent dead link"
 * This Banglatech reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This bhorerkagoj reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Samakal reference is a mention-in-passing and fails WP:CORPDEPTH
 * This ittefaq reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Joomla Day reference is paid promotion from the company as a sponsor. Fails WP:ORGIND
 * This Joomla reference is marked as a "permanent dead link"
 * So not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. Most are based on company marketing. Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this article lower importance also shown advertising and promotional. Fails WP:GNG .-- Nahal (T) 12:31, 01 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.