Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joomag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Joomag

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No independent reliable sources that discuss the company in detail, therefore not notable per WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I'm unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG.  Gongshow  Talk 16:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nomination. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.