Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joosa Riekkinen

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 04:44, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Joosa Riekkinen
At first I thought it was vanity, but I'm not 100% sure. was a game developer for a year - some 600 google hits. Even if not a vanity I doubt he qualifies for notability. Grutness|hello? 05:22, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with Liero which he developed during that year. Kappa 05:32, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete programmers/developers unless legendarily famous (i.e. Bill Gates, Sid Meier, etc.) Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 06:01, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Liero, since that's the only thing he's notable for. Radiant! 08:48, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable author of non-notable hobbyist computer game. jni 10:16, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Liero. The game seems to have several fan-sites even 5 years since it stopped being developed, thus it's notable. Grue 10:28, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, codercruft. ComCat 02:08, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, programming one obsolete (even when it was created) game that made it onto WP doesn't seem encyclopedic to me. Wyss 03:33, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Author of a real-time Worms game that is still included with some linux distros today. Seems notable to me. It had a large community at its peak, and derivatives of it are still being developed. What harm does this entry do? Edogy 02:13, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.