Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Angel Henderson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punting the salt question to WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Jordan Angel Henderson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I tagged the article for speedy deletion but the tag was removed without any reason given. Article is an WP:AUTOBIO and WP:PROMO for a non-notable musician. GPL93 (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Still no evidence of any notability. Does not satisfy criteria for WP:SINGER. Sources are adverts, regurgitated press releases and little else. Searches still find nothing better. Fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk  21:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I note also that the user removing the AfD template on more than one occasion, Avibrown800mtwominutes self identifies as the agent for the article subject here.  Velella  Velella Talk 11:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, clear vanity page creffett (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Can't find any significant coverage. Schazjmd   (talk)  23:11, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Given this is a likely vanity page that has already been deleted via AfD once this month, I believe WP:SALTing the article space should be considered. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with nominator and comments above that there is nothing to suggest that the subject of the article comes close to meeting notability standards. Also the article does not really read like an encyclopedic entry and as noted could be a vanity page. Dunarc (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.