Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Archer (forward, born 1993)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy draftify. Since this was moved into mainspace mistakenly, WP:SNOW applies. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Jordan Archer (forward, born 1993)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Footballer who fails NFOOTY and GNG. According to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Notability he has made no appearances in competition between two fully professional teams. Spike &#39;em (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * (I see from history he's been PRODed and AfDed in past so I assume AfD is the way to go) Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Draftify. I'm afraid the revival of this article came about because of a clumsy mistake by me saying Jordan Archer had played for Bury, his parent club, in the FA Cup when I knew full well it was Southport, his loan club, who are non-league. Can the article be saved in draft form as it is probable that Jordan will play for Bury when his loan ends? Apologies for the mistake. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Draftify - moved into mainspace prematurely given the confusion above, should be draftified. Unsure why has gone straight to AFD given we were discussing the article just 12 hours ago; if they had highlighted the issue then we could have been BOLD and sorted it, rather than going through all this bureaucracy. GiantSnowman 09:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Because I didn't realise draftifying was an option, so I set the ball rolling on what I thought was needed. As mentioned above I checked and saw that the article had previously been de-PRODed and AfDed in past, so I thought an AfD would be needed. If you could point me to some documentation showing draftifying was an option so I can read up on it that would be very helpful. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Draftify per the above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.