Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Francis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the actor has had significant roles in major productions, and that N:ACTOR is met. This was certainly not at all evident when the article was nominated. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Jordan Francis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed PROD, as previously PRODded. Article consists only of a list of credits, without evidence that any are significant. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete The sourcing we have here is IMDb and the person's own website. We need reliable 3rd party sources. Especially since the article has existed for 10 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Move to draft. Keep. A brief (but by no means comprehensive) news search indicates that there are reliable sources providing reasonably in-depth coverage of this subject, although they have not made it into the article. This one is certainly promising. BD2412  T 05:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to draft There is not that much coverage but he does have a couple of singles on Spotify that have more than 7 millions plays. One of them 10 million plays. He has fans and is signed.  scope_creep Talk  12:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO, and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 21:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Move to draft as he does have coverage that can be used to improve the article before it is ready for mainspace, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I added sources and information to the article ,its still a work in progress but it can be improvedGeorgiamarlins (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca  talk 16:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Relisted one more time, any assessment from new or previous participants as to whether the late changes made by User:Georgiamarlins sufficiently solve the problems with the article would help us conclude what the consensus is here. ~ mazca  talk 16:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He meets WP:NACTOR "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". He was part of the main cast of Carl², Connor Undercover, Da Boom Crew, The Save-Ums! and Cross Country Fun Hunt, which doesn't have a WP article yet, but appears to have got a lot of coverage in Canada. The filmography showed him as having a main role in only one production, but in fact he had significant roles in several - either the lead, or a main supporting role. I have done some editing on the article, and will add more sources for his roles and music. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no great objection to keeping it now, as somewhat improved and subject to likely further improvement. BD2412  T 17:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. Now I have no objection to keeping, provided that the "Main role"s are legitimate.  Again, there not being individualized references, I'm not sure which of the sources (if any) support the statements.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have changed my !vote above to Keep. BD2412  T 06:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.