Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan International Air Cargo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   No consensus, default to keep. Notability does seem to be questionable, but the keep arguments certainly are plausible. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  16:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Jordan International Air Cargo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Small cargo airline. Does not meet the notability standards at Notability_(Transportation). A7 speedy was reversed, so it's AFD time. TexasAndroid (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete failing WP:CORP—news search finds nothing notable. However, the article should never have been sent to speedy, and the nominators use of Notability_(Transportation) as rationale should be avoided, as the mentioned page is a proposed policy; consensus is far from being reached on that page. Arsenikk (talk)  13:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The original CSD nominator did not use the airline notability page, he used simply WP:CORP, via db-corp, which, IMHO, it still fails, and that *should* make it A7 speedy-able. Noting in WP:CORP says airlines are exempt.  The airline notability page was first brought up by the admin who reversed my A7 speedy, as his justification for the reversal. - TexasAndroid (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I would agree that an A7 Speedy was inappropriate as there clearly is an assumption that an airline would be notable - the proposed guideline referred to in the nom (Notability_(Transportation)) says "Commercial airlines offering services to the public are notable." I don't agree with that statement, and the proposed guideline needs some more input to become a useful resource for AfD, however it does indicate the confusion over what may or may not be assumed to be notable, and why a Speedy shouldn't have been used.  SilkTork  *YES! 01:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Marka International Airport per WP:Product. There is little information on the airline, however it does exist, and it operates from Marka, so it would be appropriate to mention it there in order to build the information in that article.  SilkTork  *YES! 01:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Update: Redirect to Marka_International_Airport.  SilkTork  *YES! 18:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Organisation has both an IATA and ICAO designator, just because the article is a stub shouldnt mean deleting it. MilborneOne (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - as far as I can tell, lives on the edge of WP:N with some independent coverage, which at least adds to nontriviality. Wily D 15:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.