Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Jemison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Jordan Jemison

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article contains no assertion of facts upon which subject's notability may be based. Subject is apparently a non-notable college student and swimmer with a famous great aunt. Subject has received no major national college swimming awards and is therefore not entitled to a presumption of notability per WP:NCOLLATH. A Google News Archive search reveals precisely ZERO independent, reliable sources to establish subject's notability per WP:GNG, WP:V and WP:RS. (Please do not be confused by articles regarding the similarly named but unrelated Jordan-Jemison corporation.) This appears to be a self-created vanity page, and it's shocking that it survived new page patrol review. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't meet notability standards for college athletics, no other reason for being notable at present. Little more than a resume.  (An earlier draft claimed he was in contention for US Olympic swim team, which might have been grounds for notability if he was picked, but he didn't make it.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Can't find a single source that would begin to establish notability under WP:GNG. If he were ever in contention for the Olympics, you'd think there'd have been some kind of coverage. Nothing appears in Google news or the archives. --Batard0 (talk) 12:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.