Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Peddle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Jordan Peddle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NHOCKEY, contested prod. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable player who has only played in lower-tier professional leagues.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  09:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NHOCKEY criteria2 as has played in the highest level league in Australia Atlantic306 (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * it's a little confusing but NHOCKEY directs us to see if the league qualifies as professional on the list at WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment -- and this league is not on that list. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Criteria 2 says the top amateur league counts where there is no professional league which is the case in Australia Atlantic306 (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC) struck keep vote as league is not on the list Atlantic306 (talk) 14:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess. But that seems to be contradicted by the ending of WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment: "Those leagues not otherwise listed are considered to confer no presumptive notability to players..." Anyway, no !vote from me. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * yes it's confusing (to me) but I do think the list takes precedence, as the preamble begins: "For lists of the leagues considered to satisfy each of the criteria below [italics added], please see the ice hockey league assessment..." Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Routine sports coverage fails to meet WP:GNG and playing in lower level leagues fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete has not played any leagues required in WP:NHOCKEY. LibStar (talk) 08:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.