Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Rice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to 2010-2011 Queensland floods. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Jordan Rice

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A very sad and brave death but the subject is not notable independently from the overall flood event Mattinbgn (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- Mattinbgn (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * REDIRECT I was in the process of converting it to a redirect to 2010–2011 Queensland floods when I was edit conflicted by Matt AfDing it. It is a plausible search term.The-Pope (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2010-2011 Queensland floods as notability was a WP:SINGLEEVENT. WWGB (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree with the above. Redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 04:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect, I don't think that anyone will disagree that this is tragic, but WP:ONEEVENT. Note there was some talk in the Courier Mail about nominating him for Australian of the Year.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC).
 * Comment It looks like the "redirect" boat has sailed but making this a redirect leaves the door open for a future recreation of the article. Is that what we really want? -- Mattinbgn (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought even if it was deleted it would be able to be recreated anyway, so what does it hurt turning it into a redirect? As The-Pope said above it is a plausible search term. Jenks24 (talk) 03:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Matt, unless his notability changes I think the arguments for redirect over article would still be true then as they would be now. How about we have a look if it happens? Bleakcomb (talk) 04:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I have edited the page a bit so it's a bit more "Wikipedia-ish" i guess. Might need some adding to I think if we are going to keep it, but how is that now? -- 10:36, 26 February 2011 (AEST)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.250.33.40 (talk)
 * Redirect, I would agree that a redirect is the correct route for this article, a tragic and untimely death but WP:ONEEVENT. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 15:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Deletionists at it again now targeting a hero who saved his younger brother. Edit the page to make it better, but I think it is important.144.136.101.108 (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Plausible search term. Sadly, not notable apart from tragic death. From Lankiveil's comment; a posthumous award might change notability, though. Bleakcomb (talk) 04:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect. No reference. I doubt the truthfulness of this person. Should include proof. Andrew Powner (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Even a cursory glance at Google would have shown you that this was a very real young man. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 16:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.