Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Schweitzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Jordan Schweitzer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Pinging Qed237 as he is interested in football-related AfDs. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication of any collage award to satisfy NCOLLATH. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy either NHSPHSATH or widerGNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  03:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Draftspace There's no policy or consensus-based reason for this article to be kept. However, as he is signed to Seattle Sounders short of a life-threatening injury, it's inconceivable that he won't either be playing there, or in their fully-professional reserve squad Seattle Sounders FC 2 shortly, and then we'd just have to recreate the article. It's really a waste of everyone's time to be trying to delete players during pre-season, when we are only going to have to recreate them shortly. Nfitz (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Its not a waste of time to delete players whom you yourself accept meet no notability guideline. It is no effort whatsoever to restore the article if he meets any criterion in the future, with no history or effort lost. Fenix down (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete- atleast for now, fails notability. Amitbanerji26 (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.