Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Thompson (footballer born 1999)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that the subject does not meet WP:NFOOTY. ansh 666 05:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Jordan Thompson (footballer born 1999)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Scrapes past NFOOTY but fails GNG. 1 substitute appearance is unlikely to generate sufficient coverage to pass GNG. This is a case of WP TOOSOON Domdeparis (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't agree with the "1 sub appearance isn't enough" argument since it's no better than the guideline in being conclusory and, unlike the guideline, does not have the mandate of the community. That being said, the single appearance was in the third-tier cup competition against a U21 team.  So that is not two pro teams, but a pro team against a youth team. RonSigPi (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear my comment is not that it is not enough to pass the topic specific guidelines because it would be had it been a qualifying match (which apparently it wasn't) but as per the NSPORT guidelines there has to be sufficient presumption that his appearances will have generated enough coverage for him to pass GNG and that it is likely that the sources can be found given enough time. My argument is that 1 sub performance is unlikely to have generated enough coverage to pass GNG hence my nomination. So for me it is TOOSOON. Domdeparis (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't think that an EFL Trophy match qualifies for the SNG; 2017–18 EFL Trophy says that it includes Premier League and Championship "B Teams". power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't satisfy NFOOTBALL as the EFL Trophy match against West Brom's Academy isn't a competitive match between two "fully-pro" clubs. Also, there is no indication the article could pass the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 15:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.